Sadiq Khan just did something no London mayor has ever done. He looked down the barrel of a Premier League relegation battle and publicly told every Londoner who isn’t a Spurs fan to cheer for West Ham.
Not because he loves West Ham. He doesn’t. He’s reportedly an Arsenal man. He told you to cheer for West Ham because if they go down, you go into your pocket.
The £2.5 million bill nobody asked for
Here’s where we are heading into the final two games. Tottenham are 17th on 38 points. West Ham are 18th on 36 points. Two points between them with two matches each to play. If West Ham beat Newcastle on Sunday they go above Spurs in the table . Anything less and the maths starts looking dangerous for the East End.
That’s the football. Here’s the financial damage.
Under the 99-year deal signed by previous mayor Boris Johnson, West Ham pay £4.4 million a year in rent, while the Greater London Authority picks up the bill for stewarding and other operating costs. If West Ham drop into the Championship, two things happen at once. The rent gets cut. The costs go up.
West Ham’s rent will halve in the Championship, knocking £2.2 million off the table immediately. The GLA then has to cover stewarding and matchday costs for 23 home games in the Championship instead of 19 in the Premier League. Commercial revenue from concerts and events at the stadium also takes a hit because suddenly the brand isn’t shifting Premier League merchandising anymore.
Add it all up and the bill lands at £2.5 million a year. Every year. Roughly 50p per Londoner, according to figures shared with the Evening Standard.
Yes, 50p sounds small. Until you multiply it by every single person in the city. Until you ask whether any of them voted for the privilege of subsidising a Premier League club owned by a billionaire family.
The worst deal in London’s history
This is where the politics gets ugly.
The mayor blamed his predecessor by name. “The previous Mayor, Boris Johnson, did the worst deal imaginable. As far as West Ham are concerned, it was the deal of the century because he basically gave them this amazing stadium rent free for 100 years.”
He’s not exaggerating. Boris Johnson handed over a stadium that cost £486 million of public money to build for the 2012 Olympics. West Ham moved in for the 2016/17 season. The terms were so favourable to the club that they make Premier League FFP look like a fair fight.
Labour assembly member Bassam Mahfouz called it “a financial fiasco so badly negotiated it could only be described as an own goal”. Strong words from a man who probably had to read the actual contract.
This is Boris Johnson’s signature on the dotted line. Nobody else’s. The man who turned the Olympic legacy into a corporate welfare scheme for an east London football club, and then walked away to do exactly the same trick with the country.
West Ham fans don’t get sympathy
This is where it gets uncomfortable for the Hammers faithful, because the answer is no. They don’t get a free pass.
West Ham fans have been living in a stadium they did nothing to pay for, watching Premier League football funded by every other London resident, for almost a decade. The club has had a sweetheart deal no rival in the country comes close to. They’ve benefited from it on every matchday for ten years. They’ve enjoyed European football off the back of it. They watched Declan Rice grow up in it before he walked out the door to Arsenal.
You don’t get to bank the upside for a decade and then ask for sympathy when the downside arrives.
The Sullivan family didn’t write the original contract. But they signed every renewal, every commercial deal, every benefit that came with it. The financial windfall has been real and ongoing. Now relegation could trigger the bill the rest of London has been quietly absorbing for years.
That’s not a tragedy. That’s a contract.
Why London is suddenly all-in on West Ham
Walk around London this week and you’ll find something genuinely strange. Arsenal fans tweeting “Come on you Irons.” Chelsea fans saying things they’d be ashamed of in any other week. Fulham, Brentford, Crystal Palace and Charlton fans suddenly remembering they’re West Ham’s allies in this fight.
The fury is real. Some of it is the £2.5 million. Some of it is the principle of taxpayers footing a Premier League stadium bill while the city argues over council cuts and crumbling infrastructure. Some of it is straight tribal hatred of Tottenham wrapped up in a more presentable economic argument.
Honestly? It depends on who you support. An Arsenal fan tweeting about £2.5 million this week is probably an Arsenal fan who’d have tweeted about Spurs going down regardless. A Brentford fan worrying about taxpayer subsidy is probably a Brentford fan with a longstanding grudge against stadium gentrification. The economics gave half of London an excuse to say out loud what they were always going to think anyway.
Which doesn’t make the maths wrong. £2.5 million is £2.5 million whether you reach it through principle or through pettiness. The destination is the same.
What just happened on the pitch
Sunday at the London Stadium. West Ham looked like they were going to nick a vital point against Arsenal until Callum Wilson’s stoppage-time goal was disallowed. Howard Webb has since confirmed VAR got it right. There was a clear and obvious offence on David Raya in the build-up. Painful for the Hammers. Correct on the laws.
Monday at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. Mathys Tel scored a sumptuous curled finish in the 50th minute to put Spurs ahead. Hero. Then with 74 minutes gone he attempted an overhead clearance, caught Ethan Ampadu in the face, and after a VAR review and pitchside monitor check, Dominic Calvert-Lewin drilled in the equaliser. Zero. Hero to zero in 24 minutes.
It was Tottenham’s tenth game at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium without a win in their last ten home games . They aren’t down yet. They aren’t safe either. Roberto De Zerbi got the job on a five-year contract and is openly building for next season while trying not to break the only constant of Spurs’ modern history.
Tottenham have never been relegated from the Premier League since its inception in 1992 . That record now sits in the hands of whoever can find one more goal in two more games.
The Spurs problem in all of this
Spurs go down? Their billionaire owners ENIC absorb the loss, the club restructures, Daniel Levy weathers it the way he always does. The financial cost to Tottenham of relegation could exceed $300 million for the club’s billionaire owners. Painful for them. Survivable. Not London’s problem.
West Ham go down? Every taxpayer in the capital eats a bill they never agreed to. Some of those taxpayers can’t afford a tube ticket this week. Some of them are working two jobs and watching their council tax climb. Some of them are about to find out they’re effectively contributing to a Championship club’s stewarding budget.
That’s why Sadiq Khan picked up the phone to the Evening Standard. “Londoners who don’t support Spurs should probably be cheering on West Ham”. It’s the most cynical, brilliant, depressing piece of political communication you’ll see all year. He’s right. He’s also using it to land a punch on Boris Johnson that he’s wanted to throw for years.
Both things can be true at once.
So what happens now?
Newcastle host West Ham on Sunday. Chelsea host Spurs on Tuesday 19 May. The final day, Spurs play Everton at home while West Ham host Leeds at the stadium that’s at the centre of all this.
West Ham now need to win at Newcastle. They probably need to beat Leeds at home. And then they need to hope Roberto De Zerbi’s Spurs lose at Chelsea, or drop points at home to Everton, or both.
It’s possible. It’s not likely. And while it plays out, Boris Johnson sits somewhere writing his next newspaper column, having long since cashed his political chips.
The Olympic Stadium, built to inspire a generation in 2012, sits in Stratford waiting to find out whose pockets it empties next.
50p doesn’t sound like much. Until you realise it’s the price every Londoner now pays for one man’s signature on a contract he never had to honour.
Leave a Reply